Quality Standards for University Research in Relation to Social Prosperity in Ecuador and the International Context
Abstract
Purpose: This study analyses the evaluation criteria of university research in Ecuador and in recent international literature, with the aim of identifying their degree of alignment with social needs.
Methodology/Approach: A systematic literature review was conducted on publications from 2020 to 2025 in the Scopus database, following PRISMA guidelines. A total of 41 studies were examined to identify evaluation metrics, conceptual frameworks, and challenges in assessing academic research.
Findings: The results confirm the predominance of quantitative indicators focused on publications, citations, and rankings, while also highlighting their limitations in addressing local issues. The literature points to the growing proposal of hybrid models that combine bibliometric indicators with criteria of social relevance, knowledge transfer, and qualitative assessments as a more balanced alternative.
Research Limitation/Implication: When contrasting these findings with the Ecuadorian model, a limited incorporation of social impact indicators is evident, underscoring the need to develop more comprehensive evaluation frameworks.
Originality/Value of paper: The value of this work lies in offering a comparative perspective between Ecuadorian regulations and international trends, providing evidence to support the design of evaluation models that balance scientific quality with the real contribution of research to socioeconomic development and inclusive social progress.
Full text article
References
Acuña-Moraga, O., Zapata-Soto, T., Novoa-Muñoz, F., Severino-González, P. and Quezada-Molina, J., 2025. Responsabilidad social universitaria y ranking QS latinoamericano. El caso de universidades públicas y privadas de Chile. Interciencia, [online] 50(5), pp.285–291. Available at: <https://www.interciencia.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/05_7341_A_Severino_v50n5_7.pdf>.
Arthur, P.L. and Hearn, L., 2021. Reshaping How Universities Can Evaluate the Research Impact of Open Humanities for Societal Benefit. The Journal of Electronic Publishing, [online] 24(1). https://doi.org/10.3998/jep.788.
Asamblea Nacional, 2023. Ley Orgánica de Educación Superior (LOES). Tercer Suplemento del Registro Oficial 245, 7-II-2023. [online] Available at: <https://atenea.epn.edu.ec/handle/25000/1000> [Accessed 10 September 2025].
Balladares, G.E.G., Carrera, G.P.T., Maza, E.C.V., Viteri, G.A.M., Jiménez, S.P.M., Tupiza, M.D.L.Á.C. and Chicaiza, M.P.L., 2024. Evaluación de la Calidad en la Educación Superior Ecuatoriana: Un Modelo de Indicadores de Estándares. Estudios y Perspectivas Revista Científica y Académica, [online] 4(2), pp.2220–2246. https://doi.org/10.61384/r.c.a..v4i2.360.
Bangani, S. and Onyancha, O.B., 2020. Evaluation of the national research foundation-rated researchers’ output at a South African university. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, [online] 70(1–2), pp.187–202. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-02-2020-0017.
Belcher, B.M., Claus, R., Davel, R. and Jones, S.M., 2021. Evaluating and improving the contributions of university research to social innovation. Social Enterprise Journal, [online] 18(1), pp.51–120. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-10-2020-0099.
den Besten, M., 2024. Publish or perish in pursuit of prosperity: toward an assessment of journal listings. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4853637.
CACES, 2019. Modelo de evaluación externa de universidades y escuelas politécnicas 2019. Available at: <https://www.caces.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/Documents/DIRECCION%20DE%20EXAMENES/modelo_armonizado%20alta%20calidad.pdf> [Accessed 10 September 2025].
CACES, 2023. Modelo de evaluación externa con fines de Acreditación para el aseguramiento de la calidad de las universidades Y escuelas politécnicas 2023. Available at: <https://www.caces.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Modelo-de-Evaluación-Externa-UEP-2023-1.pdf> [Accessed 15 September 2022].
Çakir, A., Kuyurtar, D. and Balyer, A., 2024. The effects of the publish or perish culture on publications in the field of educational administration in Türkiye. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, [online] 9, p.100817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100817.
Carranco Madrid, S. del P., Reinoso Ortiz, D.D. and Torres Barzola, G.A., 2025. Inversión en investigación y producción científica de las universidades ecuatorianas. Revista InveCom / ISSN en línea: 2739-0063, [online] 5(2), pp.1–6. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13978642.
CEPAL, 2022. Hacia la transformación del modelo de desarrollo en América Latina y el Caribe: producción, inclusión y sostenibilidad. [online] CEPAL. Available at: <https://hdl.handle.net/11362/48308> [Accessed 10 September 2025].
Cheng, Z., Xiao, T., Chen, C. and Xiong, X., 2022. Evaluation of Scientific Research in Universities Based on the Idea of Education for Sustainable Development. Sustainability, [online] 14(4), p.2474. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042474.
Dotti, N.F. and Walczyk, J., 2022. What is the societal impact of university research? A policy-oriented review to map approaches, identify monitoring methods and success factors. Evaluation and Program Planning, [online] 95, p.102157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102157.
Escobar-Jiménez, C., 2022. Doctores, incentivos de titulación e impacto en la investigación: Un panorama general de los profesores con doctorado en el sistema ecuatoriano de educación superior. Revista Andina de Educación, [online] 5(2). https://doi.org/10.32719/26312816.2022.5.2.8.
Findler, F., 2021. Toward a sustainability assessment framework of research impacts: Contributions of a business school. Sustainable Development, [online] 29(6), pp.1190–1203. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2218.
Gierhake, K. and Jardon, C.M.F., 2022. El papel de las universidades locales en la difusión de innovaciones sociales: El caso del distrito municipal de Quito. Revista Científica Visión de Futuro, [online] 26(1). Available at: <https://visiondefuturo.fce.unam.edu.ar/index.php/visiondefuturo/article/view/509> [Accessed 10 September 2025].
Golhasany, H. and Harvey, B., 2022. Academic freedom, the impact agenda, and pressures to publish: understanding the driving forces in higher education. SN Social Sciences, [online] 2(8), p.163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00468-8.
Gunawan, J., Aungsuroch, Y. and Fisher, M.L., 2021. Nurse education today: Between teaching and publication focus. Belitung Nursing Journal, [online] 7(4), pp.262–266. https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.1798.
Hanna, C.R., Gatting, L.P., Boyd, K.A., Robb, K.A. and Jones, R.J., 2020. Evidencing the impact of cancer trials: insights from the 2014 UK Research Excellence Framework. Trials, [online] 21, p.486. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04425-9.
Ilieva-Trichkova, P., Boyadjieva, P. and Dimitrova, R., 2024. Higher education as a public good and social cohesion: an exploratory study from a European comparative perspective. European Journal of Higher Education, [online] 14(sup1), pp.69–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2024.2403605.
Jahn, S., Newig, J., Lang, D.J., Kahle, J. and Bergmann, M., 2022. Demarcating transdisciplinary research in sustainability science—Five clusters of research modes based on evidence from 59 research projects. Sustainable Development, [online] 30(2), pp.343–357. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2278.
Javadi, M., Amini-Rarani, M., Aghdak, P. and Samouei, R., 2025. Strategic Analysis of the Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences: Challenges and Policy Solutions. Journal of Isfahan Medical School, [online] 43(811), pp.363–367. https://doi.org/10.48305/jims.v43.i811.0363.
de Jong, S.P.L. and Balaban, C., 2022. How universities influence societal impact practices: Academics’ sense-making of organizational impact strategies. Science and Public Policy, [online] 49(4), pp.609–620. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scac012.
Jonker, H., Vanlee, F. and Ysebaert, W., 2022. Societal impact of university research in the written press: media attention in the context of SIUR and the open science agenda among social scientists in Flanders, Belgium. Scientometrics, [online] 127(12), pp.7289–7306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04374-x.
Khomyakov, M., 2021. Should science be evaluated? Social Science Information, [online] 60(3), pp.308–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184211022101.
Krepsky, G.M., 2024. Ciência jurídica e função social da pesquisa acadêmica: indicadores da produção científica e as políticas públicas de pós-graduação. Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas, [online] 14(3). https://doi.org/10.5102/rbpp.v14i3.8590.
Lauronen, J.-P., 2020. The dilemmas and uncertainties in assessing the societal impact of research. Science and Public Policy, [online] 47(2), pp.207–218. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scz059.
Li, D., Lo, W.Y.W. and Yang, R., 2024. Unpacking the discourse surrounding the impact agenda in the Hong Kong Research Assessment Exercise 2020. Research Evaluation, [online] 33, p.rvae034. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvae034.
Marino-Jiménez, M., Ramírez-Durand, I.L., Pareja-Lora, A. and Cieza-Esteban, A., 2024. Research in Latin America: bases for the foundation of a training program in higher education. Cogent Education, [online] 11(1), p.2319432. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2319432.
Marra, M., 2022. Productive interactions in digital training partnerships: Lessons learned for regional development and university societal impact assessment. Evaluation and Program Planning, [online] 95, p.102173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102173.
Matic Girard, I. and Girard, O., 2025. University Rankings in Sport Science: A True Reflection of Excellence? International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 20(4), pp.600–604. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2024-0109.
Mfengu, A., 2025. Socially Just Research Impact Assessment as a Foundation for the Advancement of Open Access and Open Science: A Case of a Research-Intensive African University. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, [online] 12(2). https://doi.org/10.31274/jlsc.18248.
Mure, L., 2024. Societal impact in research information management systems’ activity data. Procedia Computer Science, [online] 249, pp.186–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.11.063.
Mushagalusa, N.G., Chuma, B.G., Mondo, M.J., Ayagirwe, B.R., Ndjadi, S.S., Karume, K. and Ngongo, F.M., 2024. Utilizing scientometric analysis to evaluate indicators of quality research at the institutional level: A case study of UEA, a young Central African university. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, [online] 10, p.100974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100974.
Mutz, R., Bornmann, L. and Haunschild, R., 2025. How to use assignments of United Nations sustainable development goals (SDGs) to scientific papers in research evaluation? The proposal of a gold standard combining assignments from different data providers. Scientometrics, [online] 130(3), pp.1519–1546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-025-05254-w.
Nemec, J., 2024. ‘Publish or Perish’: Social Science University Programmes In Central and Eastern Europe. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, [online] 20(SI), pp.106–111. https://doi.org/10.24193/tras.SI2024.14.
Nogueiro, T., Saraiva, M. and Jorge, F., 2022. Total Quality Management and Social Responsibility an Approach Through Their Synergies in Higher Education Institutions. In: A. Mesquita, A. Abreu and J.V. Carvalho, eds. Perspectives and Trends in Education and Technology. Singapore: Springer. pp.311–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5063-5_26.
Oquendo, E.M.D., 2019. Innovación Social: nociones de organismos multilaterales y concepciones universitarias. Revista Virtual Universidad Católica del Norte, [online] (56), pp.72–88. Available at: <https://revistavirtual.ucn.edu.co/index.php/RevistaUCN/article/view/1038> [Accessed 10 September 2025].
Orellana Navarrete, V. and Balseca Córdova, L., 2020. Innovación Social y Educación Superior en Ecuador: Un análisis al Modelo de Evaluación Externa de Universidades y Escuelas Politécnicas 2019. Revista Andina de Educación, [online] 3(2), pp.25–31. https://doi.org/10.32719/26312816.2020.2.3.4.
Page, M.J., McKenzie, J.E., Bossuyt, P.M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T.C., Mulrow, C.D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J.M., Akl, E.A., Brennan, S.E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J.M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M.M., Li, T., Loder, E.W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L.A., Stewart, L.A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A.C., Welch, V.A., Whiting, P. and Moher, D., 2021. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, [online] 372, p.n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.
Peralta-González, M.J. and Gregorio-Chaviano, O., 2022. Scientific activity evaluation in Cuban universities: Analysis based on Scival (2011-2021). Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication, [online] 2(1). https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.145.
Perero Espinoza, G.A., Isaac Godínez, C.L., Díaz Aguirre, S. and Ramos Alfonso, Y., 2022. Modelo para la contribución a la gestión de la sostenibilidad en universidades ecuatorianas. Revista Universidad y Sociedad, [online] 14(3), pp.733–744. Available at: <http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S2218-36202022000300733&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es> [Accessed 10 September 2025].
Radushinsky, D.A., Zamyatin, E.O., Radushinskaya, A.I., Sytko, I.I. and Smirnova, E.E., 2024. The Performance and Qualitative Evaluation of Scientific Work at Research Universities: A Focus on the Types of University and Research. Sustainability, [online] 16(18), p.8180. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188180.
Ramassa, P., Avallone, F. and Quagli, A., 2024. Can “publishing game” pressures affect the research topic choice? A survey of European accounting researchers. Journal of Management and Governance, [online] 28(2), pp.507–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-023-09667-8.
Sedighi, M., 2020. Evaluating the impact of research using the altmetrics approach (case study: the field of scientometrics). Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, [online] 69(4–5), pp.241–252. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-02-2019-0013.
Sherin, H., T.M., V. and Mavily, P., 2021. Research Productivity of Indian Institute of Science (I I Sc), Bangalore during 2000-2019: A Scientometric Study. [online] Available at: <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351223936_Research_Productivity_of_Indian_Institute_of_Science_I_I_Sc_Bangalore_during_2000-2019_A_Scientometric_Study#:~:text=This%20study%20evaluates%20the%20research%20productivity%20of%20IISc%2C,downloaded%20and%20analyzed%20using%20Biblioshiny%20and%20Excel%20software.>.
Silva Jiménez, V. and Ortiz Moya, S.E., 2021. La educación superior en el contexto del desarrollo sostenible y la socioformación como respuesta de integración. Panorama del Modelo Educativo en la Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica del Ecuador. Dominio de las Ciencias, [online] 7(3), pp.1519–1537. Available at: <https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8229700> [Accessed 10 September 2025].
Steingard, D. and Rodenburg, K., 2023. Societal Impacts of Higher Education Research: From ‘Publish or Perish’ to ‘Publish and Prosper’ in Business School Scholarship. Sustainability, [online] 15(13), p.10718. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310718.
Steingard, D. and Rodenburg, K., 2025. Assessing the Societal Impact of Academic Research With Artificial Intelligence (AI): A Scoping Review of Business School Scholarship as a ‘Force for Good’. Learned Publishing, [online] 38(3), p.e2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.2010.
Stocco Ranieri, N.B., 2022. Between Tradition and the Future: On Metrics and Performance Indicators for the Faculty of Law at University of São Paulo. International Journal of Educational Reform, [online] 31(2), pp.107–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567879211001821.
Times Higher Education, 2025. Impact Ranking. [online] Times Higher Education (THE). Available at: <https://www.timeshighereducation.com/impactrankings> [Accessed 10 September 2025].
Trinh, N.T.H., 2023. Higher Education and Its Role for National Development. A Research Agenda with Bibliometric Analysis. Interchange (Toronto, Ont. : 1984), [online] 54(2), pp.125–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-023-09493-9.
Troncoso, E., Ganga-Contreras, F. and Briceño, M., 2022. Incentive Policies for Scientific Publications in the State Universities of Chile. Publications, [online] 10(2), p.20. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications10020020.
Trueblood, J.S., Allison, D.B., Field, S.M., Fishbach, A., Gaillard, S.D.M., Gigerenzer, G., Holmes, W.R., Lewandowsky, S., Matzke, D., Murphy, M.C., Musslick, S., Popov, V., Roskies, A.L., ter Schure, J. and Teodorescu, A.R., 2025. The misalignment of incentives in academic publishing and implications for journal reform. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, [online] 122(5), p.e2401231121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2401231121.
Vásquez Villamar, G.I., Yagual Villegas, F.E., Larreta García, F.S. and Poveda Viteri, C.E., 2024. Calidad de la educación superior. Caso Ecuador. RECIMUNDO, [online] 8(2), pp.114–122. https://doi.org/10.26820/recimundo/8.(2).abril.2024.114-122.
Wang, X. and Ruan, J., 2024. Education helps to achieve shared prosperity: evidence from China. Frontiers in Education, [online] 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1296141.
Yi, K. and Li, P., 2022. Zero Waste Scientific Research Evaluation: The Scientific Research Evaluation System Framework to Stimulate Scholars’ Empathy and Innovation Intention. Sustainability, [online] 14(21), p.14175. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114175.
Zamora, R., Mantilla, M. and Pullas, P., 2019. La educación superior en Ecuador: situación actual y factores de mejora de la calidad. Revista Ecos de la Academia, [online] 3(06), pp.217–225. Available at: <https://revistasojs.utn.edu.ec/index.php/ecosacademia/article/view/72> [Accessed 10 September 2025].
Zhao, K., Li, J. and Liang, H., 2025. Reconfiguring power: a field analysis of China’s research evaluation reform. Higher Education. [online] https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-025-01480-6.
Zhou, T., Law, R. and Lee, P.C., 2021. Exploring Sustainable Measurements of Academic Research: How Do Faculty Members in Teaching-Oriented Universities of China Evaluate Good Research in Tourism and Hospitality? Sustainability, [online] 13(20), p.11129. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011129.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2025 Marcia Lisbeth Verdugo Arcos, Samantha Lesli Toala Assef , Renato Daniel Basantes Silva, Rosa Marieta Ambi Infante
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access. This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.
Authors who publish with the Quality Innovation Prosperity agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.