Comparative Analysis of Work Engagement, Work-Life Balance, and Soft Skills on Employee Performance: A Generational Perspective (Gen Y vs. Gen Z)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v30i2.2404

Keywords:

work engagement, work–life balance, soft skills, employee performance, generation Y and Z

Abstract

Purpose: This study examined levels of work engagement, work–life balance, soft skills, and employee productivity; the relationships among these variables; and how their effects differ across generations.

Methodology/Approach: A quantitative cross-sectional survey of 800 Thai employees used validated Likert-scale questionnaires and using descriptive statistics, correlation, regression, t-tests, ANOVA, and MANCOVA.

Findings: Work–life balance scored highest, work engagement lowest. Work engagement and work–life balance significantly predicted productivity
(p < 0.001); soft skills did not. Generational differences were significant for engagement, balance, and productivity, but not soft skills.

Research Limitation/Implication: The cross-sectional design, non-probability sampling, and self-reported measures limit causal inference. Findings support strengthening engagement and work–life balance to boost productivity, while soft skills remain valuable for teamwork.

Originality/Value: This study integrates work engagement, work–life balance, and soft skills into one framework explaining productivity among Generation Y (Gen Y) and Generation Z (Gen Z) employees in Thailand, informing generation-specific HR strategies.

Author Biographies

  • Narudom Torthienchai, University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce, Bangkok

    University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce

    Bangkok

    Thailand

  • Ruedeechanok Rungruangmaitree, University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce, Bangkok

    University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce

    Bangkok

    Thailand

References

Abdelwahed, N. A. A., & Al Doghan, M. A. A. (2023). Developing employee productivity and performance through work engagement and organizational factors in an educational society. Societies, 13(3), Article 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13030065

Adecco Thailand. (2023). Labor market outlook & salary guide 2023. Bangkok, Thailand: Adecco Group. Retrieved from https://adecco.co.th/en/news/detail/press-releases/overview-of-salary-rate-2023

Deloitte. (2023). Striving for balance, advocating for change: The Deloitte Global 2023 Gen Z and Millennial Survey. London, England: Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/global/en/pages/about-deloitte/articles/genzmillennialsurvey.html

Dimock, M. (2019). Defining generations: Where Millennials end and Generation Z begins. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/

Francis, T., & Hoefel, F. (2018). “True Gen”: Generation Z and its implications for companies. New York, NY: McKinsey & Company. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/consumer-packaged-goods/our-insights/true-gen-generation-z-and-its-implications-for-companies

Hanaysha, J. (2016). Improving employee productivity through work engagement: Empirical evidence from higher education sector. Management Science Letters, 6(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2015.11.006

Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.

ManpowerGroup Thailand. (2024). ManpowerGroup employment outlook survey Thailand. Bangkok, Thailand.

McCrindle, M., & Fell, A. (2020). The future of the workforce. Sydney, NSW: McCrindle Research. Retrieved from https://mccrindle.com.au/article/topic/work-wellbeing/the-future-of-work/

Muskat, B., & Reitsamer, B. F. (2020). Quality of work life and Generation Y: How gender and organizational type moderate job satisfaction. Personnel Review, 49(1), 265–283. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-11-2018-0448

Parker, K., & Igielnik, R. (2020). On the cusp of adulthood and facing an uncertain future: What we know about Gen Z so far. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/05/14/on-the-cusp-of-adulthood-and-facing-an-uncertain-future-what-we-know-about-gen-z-so-far/

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. Retrieved from https://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf

Riyanto, S., Ariyanto, E., & Lukertina, L. (2019). Work life balance and its influence on employee engagement “Y” generation in courier service industry. International Review of Management and Marketing, 9(6), 25–31. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.32479/irmm.8553

Schroth, H. (2019). Are you ready for Gen Z in the workplace? California Management Review, 61(3), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619841006

Sumiati, S. & Puspita, T. (2023). Mengukur dampak hard skill dan soft skill terhadap kinerja pegawai pada Satuan Kerja Pelaksanaan Jalan Nasional Wilayah II Provinsi Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Menara Ekonomi, 9(2), 72–78.

Turner, A. (2015). Generation Z: Technology and social interest. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 71(2), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1353/jip.2015.0021

Downloads

Published

2026-08-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Comparative Analysis of Work Engagement, Work-Life Balance, and Soft Skills on Employee Performance: A Generational Perspective (Gen Y vs. Gen Z). (2026). Quality Innovation Prosperity, 30(2), 81-94. https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v30i2.2404