INTEGRATED COST MODEL FOR IMPROVING THE PRODUCTION IN COMPANIES
Abstract
Purpose: All processes in the company play important role in ensuring functional integrated management system. We point out the importance of need for a systematic approach to the use of quantitative, but especially statistical methods for modelling the cost of the improvement activities that are part of an integrated management system. Development of integrated management systems worldwide leads towards building of systematic procedures of implementation maintenance and improvement of all systems according to the requirements of all the sides involved.
Methodology: Statistical evaluation of the economic indicators of improvement costs and the need for a systematic approach to their management in terms of integrated management systems have become a key role also in the management of processes in the company Cu Drôt, a.s. The aim of this publication is to highlight the importance of proper implementation of statistical methods in the process of improvement costs management in the integrated management system of current market conditions and document the legitimacy of a systematic approach in the area of monitoring and analysing indicators of improvement with the aim of the efficient process management of company. We provide specific example of the implementation of appropriate statistical methods in the production of copper wire in a company Cu Drôt, a.s. This publication also aims to create a model for the estimation of integrated improvement costs, which through the use of statistical methods in the company Cu Drôt, a.s. is used to support decision-making on improving efficiency.
Findings: In the present publication, a method for modelling the improvement process, by an integrated manner, is proposed. It is a method in which the basic attributes of the improvement in quality, safety and environment are considered and synergistically combined in the same improvement project. The work examines the use of sophisticated quantitative, especially statistical methods for determining the most accurate estimation of the costs associated with improving processes. Model is based on known methods for modelling the cost of quality, safety and environment. It connects these costs into one function connected to the basic parameter of improvement, i.e. parameter, which is the subject of the improvement in the process. Created model focuses on determining the costs associated with reaching a certain level of improved parameter. The model is three-dimensional, while the third dimension is represented by the time.
Value: The proposed model uses modern statistical methods, some of which are substantially modified to suit the particular types of parameters of sub-processes taking place during rolling of copper wire. Integrated cost model for improving the production of copper wire, has another meaning: (i) allows to carry out an economic estimate of the costs associated with improving; (ii) highlights the bottlenecks in meeting customer requirements; (iii) proposes a methodology for the experimental verification of individual analyses; (iv) provides specific hypotheses about the set-up of process parameters, which can be verified in practice; (v) also proposes modifications of methods focused on regulation and estimation of capability of critical improvement parameter; (vi) demonstrated the merits and application of quantitative methods in practical conditions of the manufacturing process.
Full text article
References
Asif, M., Fisscher O.A.M, de Bruijn E.J. and Searcy, C., 2010. Meta-management of integration of management systems. The TQM Journal, 22(6), pp.570–582.
Douglas A. and Glen D., 2000. Integrated management systems in small and medium enterprises. Total Quality Management, 11(4/5&6), pp.686-690.
Griffith A., 2000. Integrated management systems: a single management system for project control? Eng Construct Architect Manag. 7, pp.232-240.
Jonker J. and Karapetrovic S., 2004. Systems thinking for the integration of management systems. Business Process Management Journal, 10(6), pp.608-615.
Jørgensen T.H., Remmen A. and Mellado, M.D., 2006. Integrated Management systems – three different levels of integration. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 14, pp.713-722.
Karapetrovic S., 2002. Strategies for the integration of management systems and standards. The TQM Magazine, 14(1), pp.61-67.
Karapetrovic S., 2003. Musings on integrated management systems. Measuring Business Excellence, 7(1), pp.4-13.
Karapetrovic, S. and Willborn, W., 1998. The system’s view for clarification of quality vocabulary. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 15(1), pp.99-120.
Karapetrovic, S. and Jonker, J., 2003. Integration of standardized management systems: searching for a recipe and ingredients. Total Quality Management, 14(04), pp.451-459.
McDonald, M., Mors, T.A. and Phillips, A., 2003. Management system integration: Can it be done? Quality Progress, 36(10), pp.67-74.
Rocha M., Searcy C. and Karapetrovic S., 2007. Integrating Sustainable Development into Existing Management Systems. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 18(1-2), pp.83-92.
Salomone R., 2008. Integrated management systems: experiences in Italian organizations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(16), November 2008, pp.1786-1806.
Wilkinson G. and Dale B.G., 1999. Integrated management systems: an examination of the concept and theory. The TQM Magazine, 11(2), pp.95-104.
Wilkinson G. and Dale B.G., 2001. Integrated management systems: a model based on a total quality approach. Managing Service Quality, 11(5), pp.318-330.
Wilkinson G. and Dale B.G., 2002. An examination of the ISO 9001:2000 standard and its influence on the integration of management systems. Production Planning & Control: The Management of Operations, 13(3), pp.284-297.
Zutshi A. and Sohal A. S., 2005. Integrated management system: The experiences of three Australian organisations. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 16(2), pp.211-232.
Authors
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access. This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.
Authors who publish with the Quality Innovation Prosperity agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.