Modern Data Architectures: Evaluation Framework for Selecting Suitable Data Platforms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v29i2.2203Keywords:
modern data architecture, data warehouse, data lakehouse, enterprise architecture, data qualityAbstract
Purpose: This paper addresses the challenge of selecting a suitable modern data architecture in the context of growing data complexity, increased demand for real-time analytics, and evolving business needs.
Methodology/Approach: The study follows the DSR process. The paper presents a structured evaluation framework based on clearly defined criteria across technical, organisational, and economic dimensions. The framework supports decision-makers in comparing data architectures, including Data Warehouse, Data Lake, and Data Lakehouse, through a weighted scoring system.
Findings: The outcome highlights the advantages of the Data Lakehouse paradigm for the evaluating organisation, which sought to combine flexibility, scalability, and advanced analytics capabilities. This paper contributes a practical and adaptable methodology that aligns enterprise and data architecture decisions.
Research Limitation/Implications: Since each question may hold varying importance for the evaluator, it is recommended that each individual question be weighted. The evaluator must possess the necessary knowledge to assign weights.
Originality/Value of paper: The methodology provides a foundation for further research on data architectures and their evaluation. It can serve as a starting point for the development of analytical tools and the implementation of case studies.
References
Brackett, M.H., 1994. Data sharing: using a common data architecture. New York: John Wiley.
European Commission, 2020. A European strategy for data. [online] Brussels: European Commission. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0066 [Accessed 23 Jan. 2025].
Gerber, A., le Roux, P., Kearney, C. and van der Merwe, A., 2020. The Zachman Framework for Enterprise Architecture: An Explanatory IS Theory. In: M. Hattingh, M. Matthee, H. Smuts, I. Pappas, Y. Kaur and M. Gerber, eds. Responsible Design, Implementation and Use of Information and Communication Technology. Cham: Springer, pp.383–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44999-5_32.
Harby, A.A. and Zulkernine, F., 2025. Data Lakehouse: a survey and experimental study. Information Systems, 127, p.102460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2024.102460.
Masaryk University, 2025. Quantitative methods in decision making. [online] Available at: https://is.muni.cz/el/1456/podzim2015/BPM_OMVE/um/43149005/prednaska_optimalizace_print.pdf [Accessed 23 Jan. 2025].
Mušić, D., Hribar, J. and Fortuna, C., 2024. Digital transformation with a lightweight on-premise PaaS. Future Generation Computer Systems, 160, pp.619–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2024.06.026.
Noran, O. and Bernus, P., 2017. Business Cloudification – An Enterprise Architecture Perspective. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems. pp.353–360. https://doi.org/10.5220/0006248603530360.
Rashed, F. and Drews, P., 2021. How Does Enterprise Architecture Support the Design and Realisation of Data-Driven Business Models? An Empirical Study. In: E. Ahlemann, O. Urbach and D. Hoffman, eds. Innovation Through Information Systems. Cham: Springer, pp.662–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86800-0_45.
Sá, J.O.e., Martins, C. and Simões, P., 2015. Big Data in the Cloud: A Data Architecture. In: Á. Rocha, A.M. Correia, F.B. Tan and K. Stroetmann, eds. New Contributions in Information Systems and Technologies. Cham: Springer, pp.723–732. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16486-1_71.
Sebastian-Coleman, L., 2018. Navigating the Labyrinth: An Executive Guide to Data Management. Basking Ridge: Technics Publications.
Serra, J., 2024. Deciphering data architectures: choosing between a modern data warehouse, data fabric, data lakehouse, and data mesh. Sebastopol: O’Reilly.
Wang, F., Jiang, J. and Cosenz, F., 2025. Understanding data-driven business model innovation in complexity: A system dynamics approach. Journal of Business Research, 186, p.114967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114967.
Wang, L., & Zhao, J. (2024). Data Assets. Strategic Blueprint for Enterprise Analytics, 59-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55885-6_4.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Felix Espinoza, Milos Maryska, Petr Doucek
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access. This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.
Authors who publish with the Quality Innovation Prosperity agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
