Dual-Horizon Quality Assurance for MBA and Doctoral Management Education: A Quality 5.0 Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v30i2.2409Keywords:
quality 5.0, postgraduate management education, human capital, assurance of learning, workplace transferAbstract
Purpose: This paper develops a quality-assurance architecture for comparing the added value of Master of Business Administration (MBA) and doctoral management education when application-oriented and research-oriented capabilities create organisational value through different mechanisms and time horizons.
Methodology/Approach: A targeted, mechanism-based conceptual synthesis integrates human-capital theory, educational-quality and assurance literature, workplace-transfer research, doctoral-education scholarship, and Quality 5.0. Sources are selected for direct construct relevance and integrated through a transparent six-layer mapping process.
Findings: The framework links programme purpose, capability formation, transfer context, near-term application, long-term capability, and organisational value. Its maturity levels and propositions show that apparent pathway superiority depends on outcome, context, and observation horizon.
Research Limitation/Implication: The framework requires empirical validation. A balanced initial target of 60 MBA and 60 doctoral management graduates is proposed for exploratory matched comparison; an a priori power analysis must confirm or increase the sample before fieldwork.
Originality/Value of paper: The model replaces credential ranking with human-centred, auditable, and time-sensitive quality assurance for programme design, employer dialogue, and continuous improvement.
References
AACSB International. (2020). 2020 guiding principles and standards for business accreditation. Tampa, FL: Author. Retrieved from https://www.aacsb.edu/-/media/documents/accreditation/2020-aacsb-business-accreditation-standards-jul-1-2022.pdf
Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41(1), 63–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00632.x
Banerjee, S., & Morley, C. (2013). Professional doctorates in management: Toward a practice-based approach to doctoral education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12(2), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2012.0159
Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871
Blume, B. D., Ford, J. K., Baldwin, T. T., & Huang, J. L. (2010). Transfer of training: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 36(4), 1065–1105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309352880
Bucci, I., Fani, V., Rossi, M., Bandinelli, R., & Tucci, M. (2026). Quality 5.0: A systematic literature review and a gap-driven research agenda. The TQM Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-12-2025-0747
Creaton, J., & Anderson, V. (2021). The impact of the professional doctorate on managers' professional practice. The International Journal of Management Education, 19(1), Article 100461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100461
European Commission. (2021). Industry 5.0: Towards a sustainable, human-centric and resilient European industry. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2777/308407
Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293930180102
Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human–AI symbiosis in organizational decision making. Business Horizons, 61(4), 577–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.007
Neumann, R. (2005). Doctoral differences: Professional doctorates and PhDs compared. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(2), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800500120027
Orbánová, I., & Urbančíková, N. (2026). Skills ecosystem misalignment in emerging technology sectors. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 30(1), 84–101. https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v30i1.2342
Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 192–210. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0072
UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. Paris, France: UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/EWZM9535
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Róbert Czakó
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access. This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.
Authors who publish with the Quality Innovation Prosperity agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
