Perceived Quality of AI-Supported Recruitment: The Role of Explainability, Trust and Human Control
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v30i2.2374Keywords:
artificial intelligence, recruitment, perceived quality, explainability, human controlAbstract
Purpose: This paper examines perceived quality of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-supported recruitment by testing how explanation, confidence information, practical AI experience, trust, willingness to use AI, perceived fairness and human control shape evaluations of AI candidate-ranking recommendations.
Methodology/Approach: The study uses an anonymous survey of Human Resources (HR)-related respondents (N = 145) and a randomised scenario comparing AI ranking without explanation with ranking supported by brief reasoning and confidence information. We use reliability checks, regression models, mediation and automation tests.
Findings: Practical AI experience significantly moderated the effect of explanation on trust and showed a weaker pattern for willingness to use AI. The moderation was not significant for perceived fairness. Intention to use AI was associated with trust, perceived usefulness, human control and prior AI experience.
Research Limitation/Implication: The non-probabilistic sample has a strong Central European component. The results measure perceptions rather than behavioural outcomes or audited fairness.
Originality/Value of paper: The paper shows that explanation and confidence strengthen trust mainly among AI-experienced respondents but do not significantly improve perceived fairness. It distinguishes between trusting AI as decision support and being convinced that AI-supported ranking is fair to candidates.
References
Carvalho, A. M., Dias, A. R., Dias, A. M., & Sampaio, P. (2024). The Quality 4.0 roadmap: Designing a capability roadmap toward quality management in Industry 4.0. Quality Management Journal, 31(2), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2024.2317478
Chen, Z. (2023). Collaboration among recruiters and artificial intelligence: Removing human prejudices in employment. Cognition, Technology & Work, 25(1), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-022-00716-0
Fabris, A., Baranowska, N., Dennis, M. J., Graus, D., Hacker, P., Saldivar, J., Zuiderveen Borgesius, F., & Biega, A. J. (2025). Fairness and bias in algorithmic hiring: A multidisciplinary survey. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 16(1), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3696457
Gonzalez, M. F., Liu, W., Shirase, L., Tomczak, D. L., Lobbe, C. E., Justenhoven, R., & Martin, N. R. (2022). Allying with AI? Reactions toward human-based, AI/ML-based, and augmented hiring processes. Computers in Human Behavior, 130, 107179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107179
Hunkenschroer, A. L., & Kriebitz, A. (2023). Is AI recruiting (un)ethical? A human rights perspective on the use of AI for hiring. AI and Ethics, 3(1), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00166-4
Hunkenschroer, A. L., & Luetge, C. (2022). Ethics of AI-enabled recruiting and selection: A review and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 178(4), 977–1007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05049-6
Kazim, E., Koshiyama, A. S., Hilliard, A., & Polle, R. (2021). Systematizing audit in algorithmic recruitment. Journal of Intelligence, 9(3), 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence9030046
Lacroux, A., & Martin-Lacroux, C. (2022). Should I trust the artificial intelligence to recruit? Recruiters’ perceptions and behavior when faced with algorithm-based recommendation systems during resume screening. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 895997. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.895997
Laurim, V., Arpaci, S., Prommegger, B., & Krcmar, H. (2021). Computer, whom should I hire? Acceptance criteria for artificial intelligence in the recruitment process. In Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 5495–5504). https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2021.668
Liu, H. C., Liu, R., Gu, X., & Yang, M. (2023). From total quality management to Quality 4.0: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 10(2), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-022-0243-z
Malin, C., Fleiß, J., Ortlieb, R., & Thalmann, S. (2025). Rejected by an AI? Comparing job applicants’ fairness perceptions of artificial intelligence and humans in personnel selection. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8, 1671997. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1671997
Raghavan, M., Barocas, S., Kleinberg, J., & Levy, K. (2020). Mitigating bias in algorithmic hiring: Evaluating claims and practices. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 469–481). https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372828
Schoeffer, J., De-Arteaga, M., & Kuehl, N. (2022). Explanations, fairness, and appropriate reliance in human-AI decision-making. Retrieved from arXiv database. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.11812
Sony, M., Antony, J., & Douglas, J. A. (2020). Essential ingredients for the implementation of Quality 4.0. The TQM Journal, 32(4), 779–793. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-12-2019-0275
Will, P., Krpan, D., & Lordan, G. (2023). People versus machines: Introducing the HIRE framework. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(2), 1071–1100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10193-6
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Coi Tran, Radoslav Delina
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access. This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.
Authors who publish with the Quality Innovation Prosperity agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
